"Autobiographies of great nations are written in three manuscripts – a book of deeds, a book of words, and a book of art. Of the three, I would choose the latter as truest testimony." - Sir Kenneth Smith, Great Civilisations

"I must write each day without fail, not so much for the success of the work, as in order not to get out of my routine." - Leo Tolstoy

I have never believed that one should wait until one is inspired because I think the pleasures of not writing are so great that if you ever start indulging them you will never write again. - John Updike

"The life of every man is a diary in which he means to write one story, and writes another; and his humblest hour is when he compares the volume as it is with what he vowed to make it." - J.M. Barrie, Peter Pan

Poetry is the shadow cast by our streetlight imaginations." - Lawrence Ferlinghetti


[Note - If any article requires updating or correction please notate this in the comment section. Thank you. - res]


Thursday, January 1, 2026

R.E. Slater - Poetry for "Two Egyptian Vases"


Two Egyptian Porphyry Vases. The Cataracts of the Nile and the Ruins of Thebes
(Zwey Ägyptische Porphyr Vasen. Die Cataracten des Nilus und die Ruinen von Theben).
From 
Entwurf einer historischen Architektur ("A Plan of Historical Architecture")


Two Egyptian Porphyry Vases

From Entwurf einer historischen Architektur
("A Plan of Historical Architecture")

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT 5.2


What endures is not what conquers,
but what learns to remain,
to participate in meaning,
and learn identity.



Introduction

The engraving commonly titled "Two Egyptian Porphyry Vases" (also captioned, Zwey Ägyptische Porphyr Vasen. Die Cataracten des Nilus und die Ruinen von Theben; translated: "Two Egyptian Porphyry Vases. The Cataracts of the Nile and the Ruins of Thebes.") is a representative example of late eighteenth‑century neoclassical visual culture. Produced as part of the architectural compendium Entwurf einer historischen Architektur ("A Plan of Historical Architecture"), the image occupies a space between archaeology, architectural pedagogy, and philosophical reflection on history. It does not merely document ancient artifacts; rather, it constructs a vision of antiquity shaped by Enlightenment ideals of order, reason, and continuity.

This essay situates the engraving within its historical, intellectual, and artistic contexts, examining how objects, landscape, and human figures collaborate to articulate a neoclassical philosophy of history - one that continues to inform modern aesthetics and institutional symbolism.

Historical Context: Enlightenment Historicism and Architecture

During the late eighteenth century, European intellectual life was marked by an intense engagement with history as a systematic and comparative discipline. Architecture, in particular, became a privileged medium through which historical knowledge could be organized and transmitted. Pattern books and architectural atlases proliferated, offering engraved plates that cataloged buildings, ornaments, and artifacts from across civilizations.

Georg Christian Freundt's book, Entwurf einer historischen Architektur, belongs squarely within this tradition. Meant to be a historical survey of architectural orders, decorative motifs, and structural precedents it presents Egyptian, Greek, Roman, and later European forms, which are assembled into a visual archive intended to educate taste and guide contemporary practice.

Within the Freundt's compendium is included engraved plates of artifacts, urns, vases, and ornamental objects from past ancient civilizations. The engraving of the two porphyry vases reflects this ambition: to isolate exemplary objects while embedding them within a carefully staged historical landscape.


Egypt as Origin and Authority

In the eighteenth‑century European imagination, Egypt functioned as both historical origin and symbolic foundation. Long before the advent of modern Egyptology, Egypt as a land and a culture, was re-imagined through classical authors, biblical narratives, travelers’ reports, and artistic speculation. It was believed to be the cradle of architecture, geometry, and sacred knowledge.

The urn engraving capitalizes on this perception. The ruins of Thebes and the cataracts of the Nile do not aim at topographical accuracy; instead, they evoke a mythic Egypt - a place of monumental beginnings. By situating the vases within this setting, the image asserts Egyptian material culture as a source of enduring authority, preceding and legitimizing later architectural traditions.

*The Ruins of Thebes - Thebes, once the monumental capital of ancient Egypt during the Middle (c. 2040 - 1750 BCE) and New Kingdom (c. 1550 - 1070 BCE) periods, is today known through its vast and evocative ruins spread along the east and west banks of the Nile near modern Luxor. Temples, pylons, colossi, and tomb complexes - most notably Karnak and Luxor - testify to centuries of religious, political, and architectural ambition. In antiquity and later European imagination, the ruins of Thebes came to symbolize both the zenith of imperial order and the inevitability of decline, standing as enduring witnesses to humanity’s attempt to render permanence from stone within a world governed by time. 


*The Cataracts of the Nile -  The Nile River contains several stretches of powerful, fast-flowing rapids known historically as the (Six) Cataracts of the Nile, formed where the river passes over shallow beds of granite and broken rock, creating strong currents, islets, and turbulent channels. Concentrated primarily in southern Egypt and Sudan, these cataracts long served as natural boundaries and serious navigational hazards in antiquity, shaping trade routes, political frontiers, and cultural exchange along the river. In the ancient imagination, the cataracts symbolized both the life-giving force and untamed power of the Nile - locations where order yielded briefly to chaos before the river resumed its steady, sustaining flow.




Nero's Red Porphyry Stone Tub in the Vatican

Porphyry and the Politics of Material

The choice of porphyry is significant. In antiquity, porphyry was among the most valued stones, prized for its durability, rarity, and imperial associations. Roman emperors reserved it for monuments, sarcophagi, and symbols of sovereign power. In neoclassical representation, porphyry thus functioned as a visual shorthand for permanence and legitimacy.

By depicting Egyptian vases carved from porphyry, the engraving subtly aligns Egyptian civilization with imperial continuity. The material bridges temporal gaps, suggesting an unbroken lineage of authority from ancient Egypt through Rome and into modern Europe. The vases become more than decorative objects; they serve as material witnesses to civilizational endurance.


Composition and Visual Order

The composition of the engraving reflects neoclassical ideals of balance, clarity, and rational order. The two vases flank the scene, anchoring the foreground with monumental weight. Their differing forms - one more elaborately ornamented, the other more vertically restrained - invite comparison without disrupting symmetry.

Between them unfolds a layered spatial recession: terrace, cascading water, middle‑distance ruins, and distant horizon. This ordered progression mirrors Enlightenment conceptions of history as intelligible and structured rather than chaotic. Even ruin is rendered legible, subordinated to compositional harmony.


Human Figures and Enlightenment Spectatorship

The inclusion of seated human figures introduces a crucial interpretive dimension. These figures are not laborers or worshippers but observers and interlocutors. One gestures toward the ruins, directing attention and modeling interpretation.

They function as stand‑ins for the viewer - embodying Enlightenment ideals of contemplation, instruction, and rational discourse. Antiquity is not encountered as an overwhelming or mystical force but as something to be studied, discussed, and understood. The past becomes accessible through reasoned observation.


Engraving Technique and Reproducibility

The plate is executed as a copper engraving, the dominant medium for architectural illustration in the period. Fine cross‑hatching creates tonal depth, while precise line work ensures clarity when printed at varying scales.

This technical precision served an epistemic purpose. Engravings were designed for circulation, study, and reuse. Their reproducibility allowed images like Two Egyptian Porphyry Vases to shape architectural education far beyond the original publication, embedding a standardized vision of antiquity into European visual culture.


Between Archaeology and Imagination

From a modern perspective, the engraving occupies an ambiguous position between documentation and invention. It predates systematic archaeological excavation and therefore reflects conjectural reconstructions rather than empirical accuracy. Yet this imaginative quality is not a flaw within its original context.

For neoclassical audiences, the goal was not faithful reconstruction but historical coherence. The engraving synthesizes fragments - objects, ruins, landscape - into a persuasive narrative of origin and continuity. It presents history not as a series of ruptures but as a harmonized whole.


Modern Afterlife and Cultural Persistence

Because Entwurf einer historischen Architektur entered the public domain and circulated widely, its images became detached from their original scholarly framework. Plates like Two Egyptian Porphyry Vases reappeared as decorative prints, educational illustrations, and later as set dressing in film and television.

FYI. The appearance of the engraving in President Siebert’s office on The Big Bang Theory TV show exemplifies academic seriousness, institutional authority, and historical depth - qualities still culturally associated with neoclassical imagery.


Conclusion

Two Egyptian Porphyry Vases is not merely an image of ancient artifacts; it is a visual philosophy of history. Through material symbolism, compositional order, and Enlightenment spectatorship, the engraving articulates a vision in which the past is stable, instructive, and aesthetically unified.

Its continued resonance demonstrates how neoclassical representations of antiquity have shaped modern assumptions about knowledge, authority, and tradition. Even when encountered casually - as in a TV screen as a set-piece hung on a wall behind a desk - the engraving carries with it centuries of intellectual aspiration, quietly affirming the enduring power of historical imagination.


Select Bibliography
  • Rykwert, Joseph. The First Moderns: The Architects of the Eighteenth Century. MIT Press.

  • Vidler, Anthony. The Writing of the Walls. Princeton Architectural Press.

  • Marchand, Suzanne. Down from Olympus: Archaeology and Philhellenism in Germany. Princeton University Press.

  • Haskell, Francis. History and Its Images. Yale University Press.




VARIATIONS ON A THEME

Two Egyptian Vases


Two red stone vases stand
as monuments to time’s passage
framing a once great, now ruined
empire flown away as water on a river.

Whose mighty ruins marked
a younger time, now grown old,
lying upon a river older than history,
remembered as lesson to the living.

Humanity lives and dies -
its purchase of time flows
like water between sky and stone,
with no strength to remain.

Civilizations come and go.
They shape. They mold.
They listen to the past,
then pass away incomplete.


by R.E. Slater
January 1, 2026
@copyright R.E. Slater Publications
all rights reserved



The ruins of Thebes before one of the Nile's cataracts

We Were Not Made to Speak

We were not made to speak,
but to wait, watch, and listen.
Before your questions,
before words are spoken,
we first learned stillness.

Our red stone is silent,
it waits without urgency -
watching rivers forget their shapes
the mighty come and go,
and gods change their grammar.

Ponderously carved as stone vases,
we are mute in our duties,
we watch and remain...
touched us with your eyes,
then ponder our meaning.


by R.E. Slater
January 1, 2026
@copyright R.E. Slater Publications
all rights reserved



Stillness as Becoming

Though we vases are unmoving,
we are events extended in time.
Porphyry is not frozen identity,
but pressure remembering itself,
held by matter agreeing to cohere,
for a time, for a while longer.

Nor is the river below us 
our opposite nor master,
but our companion - 
flow and form are not rivals;
they are alternating gestures
in the same cosmic sentence.

The ruins behind us are not failures.
They were once processes completed,
released for duty, function, and flair.
Nothing around us escapes becoming -
not stone, not water, nor even memory.

Our witness is not to permanence,
but to faithfulness to our being;
remaining what we are long enough
to offer ourselves to what comes next.
For even stillness participates in living.


by R.E. Slater
January 1, 2026
@copyright R.E. Slater Publications
all rights reserved



What Remains

Not the river,
though it keeps returning.

Not the stone,
though it learned how to wait.

Not the city,
which mistook duration for destiny.

What remains
is the space where they met -
the pause where form did not resist change,
and change did not rush to erase form.

Here, weight became listening,
motion learned reverence.

The vases did not survive history;
they participated in history,
holding together just long enough
for memory to find a body.

Nothing ever lies finished -
Even ruin continues.
Even stillness works.

And we explorers,
arriving late,
standing briefly,
looking longer than we expected -
become part of this interval too.

So the world continues apace:
not by triumph,
but by balance;
not by certainty,
but by offering shape
to whatever comes next.


by R.E. Slater
January 1, 2026
@copyright R.E. Slater Publications
all rights reserved



The Persistence of Relation
(a processual version)

"Two Egyptian Red Porphyry Vases"
are not substances preserved against time;
they are societies of occasions
that achieved sufficient coherence
to endure, and last.

Nor is porphyry mere inert matter
but a patterned experience
of pressure, heat, and mineral memory -
concresced into form and function,
beauty and art,
repeatedly renewed
through relation with world and viewer.

Nor is the river below mere flux;
it is creativity ever in motion,
a primordial advance against time
refusing finality.

Nor do the ruins signify decay -
but completed occasions,
their subjective aims fulfilled,
their objective immortality
proceeding forward as influence.

Nothing in Freundt's engraving stands alone.
Each element prehends the others:
 - stone feels water,
 - water shapes ruin,
 - ruin instructs the eye,
 - the eye becomes part of the event.

Even God is not absent here -
not as coercive Designer,
but as Lure towards harmony,
the persuasive aim
 - that invites stone to hold,
 - rivers to flow,
 - and history to become
without demanding permanence.

What remains, then,
is not stasis,
but faithful repetition -
as an ongoing capacity of the world
to gather multiplicity
into momentary order,
then release it again
for further evolving.

Nor does the engraving show eternity.
Rather, it performs it -
 - as relational endurance,
 - as beauty that survives
 - not by stopping time
 - but by ever moving with it.


by R.E. Slater
January 1, 2026
@copyright R.E. Slater Publications
all rights reserved



No comments:

Post a Comment