My goal was a hundred pieces and I'm at 58 with 10-12 to go, making it 68-70. I also have six completed short stories and another six I need to rewrite. And then I have one very lengthy sports story I wrote a year ago which needs to be re-written in a different voice, as well as a theology book I've started. But each time I do I get some personal disaster which pulls me away from it (which seems highly coincidental to me, as it's been a several year pattern ongoing).
My theology book consists of two major sections of 10-12 chapters each. The first section is a teaching section and the second section reviews each previous chapter integrating them with one another. I'm tracing major thematic elements between the testaments and tying them together to help simplify reading the Christian bible from its vast theological complexity. It's mainly for my son and daughter as a biblical theological premier (not systematics theology but biblical theology). Once it's written I have a theological professor in mind whom I wish to contact who teaches and thinks in the style as my beloved friend, and now deceased professor, Carl B. Hoch. With his input I hope to remove inaccuracies and update it generally from someone much closer to the material than I currently am.
Overall, I like writing short stories, but I prefer the poetry format better because of all the many varieties that it allows for personal expression, creating new words and ideas, tone, coloring, shading, everything! Sooo, I think I made a good start even though I'm short by 30 pieces, but its still enough to judge where I'm at and see if its any good (my general impression is that they each need a rewrite to sharpen up their tone and focus and readability) and whether they might stand up to reader interest or not. I haven't tried a Shakespearan sonnet and would like to try that someday just to see if I can. But with Flagpole Days I did try a running sentence broken into 12 verse sections and am quite pleased with its lilt and composition. The thought occurred as I was listening to Mozart's Requiem which gave me the idea of seeing how many rounds/voices could be put into a musical piece and still get one overarching theme... I think he got up to 14 competing rounds/voices making for one massive sound which is exquisite to the ear held in rapture.
At this point I should probably find some outside opinions and a publisher to see what's next, though generally I find this a distasteful task and would rather not. My knowledge of critics tells me to beware overvaluing their opinions... John Keats is a good example of perserverance by following heart/pen while allowing the task itself to resolve any future readership. Too, I've only ever have written for me and my kids, but from the several people who have read them I think I should share them as they are generally liked, though I care not about this but whether they might add thought and contemplation as I speak my soul. I do worry about how personal they are, but I'm sure every poet does. They are myself unsheathed as I can allow that task, and a reader will either like them or not. I cannot be anything less than myself and can only speak of what I hear and wish to write against the streams of humanity that sings its own songs alongside mine own.
RE Slater